You are here:   Features > The onslaught against the West's moral codes
 

Far from utopia, however, this thinking resulted in something more akin to hell on earth. For the worship of man through reason led straight to totalitarianism. It was reason that would redeem religious superstition and bring about the kingdom of Man on earth. And just like medieval apocalyptic Christian belief, this secular doctrine would also be unchallengeable and heretics would be punished. This kind of fanaticism infused the three great tyrannical movements that were spun out of Enlightenment thinking: the French Revolution, Communism and Fascism.

Professor Richard Landes, a scholar of apocalyptic movements, notes that for the French revolutionaries the millennial hope lay not in scripture but in Rousseau’s theories of freedom and the general will which would be expressed by the liberated voice of the people. The world would be perfected through egalitarianism. On November 10, 1793, the Committee of Public Safety abolished the worship of God and substituted for it the “Cult of Reason”. At the same time, this same committee of 12 men summarily executed thousands of people in the Terror which only ended with the execution of its two masterminds, Robespierre and Saint-Just, in 1794.

Kant and Hegel developed the notion that historical process drove towards collective salvation defined in secular terms; and Marx offered a further variant of such a process that inexorably drove towards collective salvation through Communism. “History,” Marx wrote, “is but a continuous transformation of human nature.”

Richard Landes observes that the “scientific” reading of history — the historical dialectic — resembled in some important ways the view of the Bible promoted by the 13th-century monk Joachim of Fiore, who viewed history as a process that promised collective salvation.

Both Communism and Fascism attempted to transform the world to create a perfected society. Both ideologies were deprived of their power with the defeat of Nazi Germany and the discrediting of Stalinism and subsequent fall of the Soviet Union. But the secular belief that man could perfect the world in his own image, and in ways that would brook no dissent, merely mutated in the latter half of the 20th century into what J.E. Talmon termed “cultural totalitarianism”.

In the Sixties, the baby-boomer generation bought heavily into the idea propounded by Herbert Marcuse and other Marxist radicals that the way to transform the West lay not through the seizure of political or economic control but through the transformation of the culture. This has been achieved over the past half century through what has been called a “long march through the institutions”, the infiltration into all the institutions of the culture — the universities, media, professions, politics, civil service, churches — of ideas that would then become the orthodoxy.
View Full Article
Tags:
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Alicia Sinclair Portland
April 11th, 2018
6:04 PM
Have read Melanies magnificent book on a couple of occasions, and this is an excellent primer and adjunct. She nails the contemporary culture brilliantly, and with both force and inexorable logic, so can`t thank her enough. The Christian Church really needs to grasp what she`s saying. Jesus was a Jew, and -as He says-came to fulfil "the Law" as opposed to abolish it. But as we know, there is contextual analysis to give us all the understanding of what exactly, the gospel writers were trying to convey. And then we`ve got Paul and church histories to pile on top of that if we`d rather do that that stick with Jesus alone.But once we`ve been to the Cross and understood what trhe empty tomb nearby means to us, then we`re free to do what we like, think as we want. But knowing that we`re a heartbeat away from Jesus the Judge. I see the Hebrew Bible as the perfect blend of Gods Love and Gods righteous anger. Dawkins, being a theological illiterate takes the worst of Joshua and Judges to parody what his version of his non-god would be. Maybe that line through the human heart between good and evil, fight and wrong has a crossbeam at the top of it. But Islam is a third rate tribute act to half heard bits of the Judeao-Christian traditions. Like atheism, it need not detain us-as long as we actually know our OWN scriptures as well as they do their Koran and their Kapitals.

Anonymous
April 8th, 2018
12:04 PM
Good read. Inspires thought.The breakdown of moral code that constrained the individual for the sake of the community seems a good explanation for the axe being laid to the root of the tree we see happening. This is a story of human morality rising up from an ego driven rule of life governed by the need to survive. A morality that extends to preserving communal life unconsciously, like animal behavior that seems moral but is an involuntary response to the law of survival. So, this law of survival that in human nature creates attachments to family, tribe, and clan becomes stressed and unable to extend to the outer reaches of state or nation. A sense of 'otherness' inevitably results as the community enlarges and it's borders become to porous to keep the contamination of 'otherness'from coming in and infecting the body. The law of survival because it emerges from the individuals need to survive and spread genes is not able to unite a world populated by many peoples, races and nations. A law from beyond the human animal mode of living that transcends the law of survival is necessary. A new law to place again within the sight of intellect the objective good that it may replace the inferior subjective good that hid the true object of the human will. The true object of the will reentered the human sphere as the Ten Commandments. From that revelation, a moral code able to transcend the law of survival and overcome it's limitations has continued to this day to develop and transcend even it'self. God said let there be light. And there was light. The light divided the darkness and God called the light day. The first day God called very good. It's interesting now that the moral code established by the revelation to Moses, for millenia stabilized societies and formed institutions that increased the quality of human life, are being usurped and replaced by an incapable and inferior morality, not only fails to credit the origin of these gifts to humanity but claim these gifts as it's own. As the culture rejects religion the state becomes a religion worshiped by the masses who congregate faithfully and listen intently to the new ecclesia. An ancient ministry hidden from view finally appearing as a new light of life to save humanity from it'self. Another God is preparing it's seat on the throne hidden within the human heart.

Cedric Michael
March 28th, 2018
8:03 PM
Claire Khaw: No, Christianity is not and never has purported to be the antithesis of Judaism, nor has Islam ever purported to be the synthesis of that supposed dialectic. Jesus was not only a Jew but a deeply loyal Jew whose own conviction was that his very life embodied the essential meaning of the Mosaic Law.It is true that the question of his divinity within a Holy Trinity of divine persons consisting of a Father, a Son, and a Holy Spirit, has been a contentious one, but the aspect of this that you seize on as absurd, namely, that the eternal absolute creator of all that exists is capable of having come into existence in time,is not actually absurd, but completely compatible with the understanding that space-time and everything in it must necessarily not only have eternal absolute being as its historical origin, but as its present substantive foundation. Space-time is not some absolute 'other' created from sheer nothingness by absolute being, but a creation with a creaturely nature created by absolute being from nothing but absolute being itself. Absolute being is one with space-time, and space-time is one with absolute being. This is St Paul's view: "We . . . have our being in God." If that is so, then God not only can but does have his being in us and can enter into his creation as one of us. Far from being absurd, this becomes eminently thinkable once you realise that the creation is not absolutely other than God, or vice versa.

Gavin Stoffberg
March 14th, 2018
3:03 PM
Thanks for a great article. Loved it!

Madge Hirsch
March 14th, 2018
10:03 AM
It is obvious that Melanie Phillips has never bothered to aquaint herself on any but the sketchiest level with Hinduism. One could argue that the order of the 10 incarnations of Vishnu were an example of evolution just as much as anything to be found in Genesis.I would suggest that the arrested development of science in Hindu India has a lot more to do with the devastation caused by neverending Islamic invasions and the reduction of the Hindu population to dhimmi status rather than cyclical notions of time. As for the tyranny of atheism there was plenty of tyranny around before the 20th century.And just look what that wonderfully vibrant Bible Belt has produced- a great deal of hypocrisy, lots of people who believe the earth is only 6,000 years old and Trump for POTUS. As for asserting that the stuff in the OT is more factual than the so called miracles of Christianity because "it happened to us"- pathetic.

Naomi King
March 12th, 2018
7:03 AM
The comments above simply prove that atheism is irrational and stupid.

Elisabeth Holland
March 12th, 2018
2:03 AM
The Hebrew Bible reveals that God is holy/pure/ righteous/just and as such is the true judge of sin. It is very hard for us to comprehend the holiness of God and just how bad sin is. Sin always perverts truth. There are so called Christians who deny the resurrection of Jesus but this is to fail to recognize the nature of God as holy, the creator and redeemer who indeed makes rational the resurrection. The Hebrew Bible points to redemption of our sin-sick sorry world through the unexpected means of the death of Jesus and its story is brought to fruition in the New Testament, but we need to read both books carefully as ask God to reveal himself to us as we do.

Claire Khaw
March 10th, 2018
10:03 PM
Judaism - Thesis Christianity - Antithesis Islam - Synthesis It is disappointing that Melanie Phillips does not mention at all the absurdity of the doctrine of the Trinity which requires all who wish to identify as Christian to say they believe that Christ is the co-equal of God. From this requirement flows cowardice, irrationality and hypocrisy leading to Westerners throwing out the morality of Christianity with the bathwater of the Trinity. http://www.yoramhazony.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/jerusalem_and_cart... explains the irrationality of Christianity rather well, I think. Tertullian’s views are those of a fanatic. But they have not been without influence. A certain strand within Christianity has always applauded this posture, and its echoes continue to be heard down to our own day. We find a similar position, in which Christian faith is taken to be “an absurdity to the understanding,” being advanced in the writings of Kierkegaard, for example: What, then, is the absurd? The absurd is that the eternal truth has come into existence in time, that God has come into existence, has been born, has grown up, etc., has come into existence… as an individual human being…. [in other words,] the absurd is precisely the object of faith, and only that can be believed…. Christianity… has required the inwardness of faith with regard to what is… an absurdity to the understanding. In the same vein, C.S. Lewis speaks of the things that Jesus asks mankind to believe, if judged by human standards, as “asinine fatuity” and “lunacy”: [Y]ou will see that what this man said was, quite simply, the most shocking thing that has ever been uttered by human lips…. asinine fatuity is the kindest description we should give…. in the mouth of any speaker who is not God, these words would imply what I can only regard as a silliness and conceit unrivalled by any other character in history…. a man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said… would either be a lunatic—on a level with a man who says he is a poached egg—or else he would be the devil of Hell. Christian faith requires belief in things that are repugnant to human reason, which permits contemporary commentators to speak of biblical faith as though it purposely stands in opposition to the dictates of human reason.

David MacKenzie
March 10th, 2018
8:03 PM
A fascinating article, and well worth the read. As an evangelical Pastor, I appreciate the Jewish and Torah apologetic. It's interesting to hear arguments from your perspective.

Anonymous
March 10th, 2018
4:03 PM
The more corrupt the character, the more they hate the idea that they will face God for judgement.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.