You are here:   Reputations >  Overrated > Slavoj Žižek

Try as one might, it is difficult to avoid the Slovenian-born philosopher Slavoj Žižek. If you miss the 30 or more books he has published since 1989, there are scores of articles, book reviews in the London Review of Books and the New Statesman and even the occasional interview in the Guardian. Failing this you can watch the film Žižek! - where, from beneath his bed sheets, he discourses upon the nature of philosophy. There is also the three-part TV documentary, The Pervert's Guide to the Cinema, from which we learn that The Sound of Music is not really a film about kindly Austrians escaping from the Nazis but rather an everyday tale of honest Fascists resisting a decadent Jewish cosmopolitan takeover. Somewhat improbably, Žižek has been the subject of an art installation and there is even an International Journal of Žižek Studies. He has been called "The Elvis of Cultural Theory", attaining the status of an Academic Rock Star, filling lecture hall after lecture hall. In the words of fellow-Marxist Terry Eagleton, Žižek is less a philosopher than a phenomenon. He is undoubtedly very clever, very engaging and very, very funny.

There is much to admire about Slavoj Žižek. He spent his early adult years as a dissident in the former Yugoslavia, suffering at the hands of the authorities. He refuses to play the conventional role of the leftist intellectual. He cannot abide orthodoxy, preferring the role of gadfly to prophet, jester to sage. He is hostile to postmodernism (describing himself as a "card-carrying Lacanian") and despises the politics of multiculturalism for its reduction of all questions to problems of toleration and difference. He is rude to vegetarians and has no sympathy for humanitarians like Bill Gates, intent on solving the world's ills through charity.

So where is the problem? Look no further than the two books Žižek has published this year: Violence and In Defense of Lost Causes. Žižek believes that the age of ideologies is not over and that the idea of global emancipation is not dead. The liberal consensus just wants us to think that it is. The ambition, in his words, is to forge a new egalitarian and emancipatory politics and to find new sites of resistance to a capitalist order based upon systematic inequality, exploitation and injustice. Where are these to be found? Drawing upon the ideas of Walter Benjamin, Žižek conjures up the category of "divine violence" as a form of pure violence that serves no purpose except as an expression of opposition to injustice in the world. Those annihilated by divine violence, he tells us, are "fully and completely guilty". Next, he imagines that divine violence has been instantiated (although often with "deplorable" outcomes) in the revolutionary politics of terror associated with Jacobinism, Leninism, Stalinism and Maoism. Each has its "redemptive moment". Remarkably, Žižek's suggestion is that if these revolutionary movements failed, it was not because they were too extreme but because they were not radical enough. He then conjectures that the Left of today has become ashamed of the Jacobin legacy of revolutionary terror, in part because, in his paraphrase of Robespierre, it wants a revolution without a revolution, a revolution which respects social rules and existing norms, a decaffeinated revolution.

View Full Article
September 25th, 2012
6:09 PM
I have just read down to the bottom of this page before realising that what I thought was the article actually contained both the article and the comments beneath. Its that badly written.

Some dude
January 14th, 2009
8:01 AM
Zizek has finally succeeded in making the counterintuitive theoretical fix that characterizes his work umcomfortable for superficial readers of his work. They can no longer pass him off as a curiosity, as the whole New Republic saga shows. Zizek rules.

December 23rd, 2008
6:12 PM
Is this a book review or an analysis of Zizek's work over the years? If the latter, it's a bit selective.

the comedy czar
December 22nd, 2008
9:12 PM
We live in a violent world, in case anyone has forgotten. Zizek would just like to see this violence properly directed for the liberation of people currently oppressed and alienated by capitalism's inherent flaws. It's really nothing new, but he does have an entertaining way of putting it. Decaffeinated liberals are half-asleep (probably due to lack of caffeine) in their self-satisfied yuppie lifestyles. Here's hoping that Zizek continues to agitate them in style!

December 4th, 2008
7:12 AM
Pardon me, I would like to make a modification to a comment I submitted earlier on Zizek regarding Jennings' article: Spinoza said we should become "'passionately reasonable' by re-directing our emotions towards conciliation and the enjoyment of living". Thank you, and Cheers to you.

December 4th, 2008
2:12 AM
My word!, if this is truly any inkling to what Zizek really wants in "egalitarian-revolutionary-terror", he's just another misguided and confused intellect advocating -with the gun of a sophist- more terrorism... for what?!,... ostensible justice. This sounds to me like "decaffeinated" intelligence... just perfunctory speculation, instead -indeed, even if out of necessity- painstakingly ruminating over the hardness of our situation. I don't have a sweeping or cataclysmic answer... however, as Spinoza had suggested, exercising "passionate reason and compassion" in our lives and the world.... Tell that to this bumbling, bloody fool.

Post your comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.